In a former blog post, “Has
the Gospel Been Preached to All the World?”, a dear brother in Christ sent me the following
comment/rebuke. Although I haven’t had enough
time to fully develop my thoughts in a way I’m totally comfortable with, I thought his
comments were worth a more timely response. This is what he wrote:
Wow, I
have been having so much fun studying this material! I have believed much this
way for a long time. But I have to tell you I am now very concerned because of
your statements about healing. How can someone understand the Word so much and
yet miss this? I get infuriated when I have leaders make statements about no
healings, limbs growing out, blind eyes open, deaf ears healed.
Have you
been to one of the trips I have been on to Guatemala in the last 3 years where
I have seen many blind eyes opened, deaf hear, bones set that were broken, kids
speak that have never spoken and on and on. Above that, we have a stream of
people who are healed on a regular basis just in our church.
Just
because you have seen nothing in the area of healings, doesn't mean that they
aren't happening all over the world today. By the way, I know of several people
in Mexico that a friend has seen raised from the dead. You also don't believe
in prophetic ministry etc. That list makes me feel less confident in everything
else you teach.
Sorry,
but I have videos of my trips I have been on where people are being healed by
the Lord on the video. Our last trip to Guatemala in November of 2013 there
were 100's of healings that we witnessed. We also have seen God heal (many
times after family has been called in or given a heads up that their love one
has days to live) cancers of all types. We have doctors say more times than we
can remember, it's a miracle, we don't understand this etc.
Though I appreciated his comments, from my perspective, they
turned a bit harsh. I think his statement, “That list makes me feel less
confident in everything else you teach” lacks both balance and perspective.
I’ve learned to NEVER throw the proverbial baby out with the bathwater. Even in
disagreement, we press on toward the upward call, constantly attempting to
renew our minds through the Word. And although
I admittedly have plenty of blind spots, am I alone? Obtuse
though I may occasionally be, I am constantly attempting to do my very best to
be objective, not allowing personal experience to unduly override Biblical
exegesis. In our fervor to “believe all things”, is it possible to be lead
astray into the weeds of the subjective?
Let me say at the outset that I think this kind gentleman has
made some invalid assumptions i.e. that I believe God CANNOT heal. Any correction with chapter and verse is
welcome, but I do not believe I’ve ever written, said or even implied, that God
was/is unable to do anything. If someone is healed, to ascribe that wonderful
gift of God’s grace to anyone or anything other than God, would be an utter travesty.
And the Bible specifically warns against such an attempt.
My position at this moment regarding the sign gifts of
the Spirit (and my views are always subject to change due to the Holy Spirit’s enlightenment),
is that I do not believe these gifts as manifested in the first century, are
of the same nature today. When's the last time someone was healed by a garment's shadow? When have you seen a 4 day old dead man walk out of his tomb? To argue that today's recipients of God’s
healing mercy, prove that the charismata as manifested throughout the transition
period (AD 30-70), is normative for today, is problematic at best.
We live in a nation of 350,000,000. There are Christian churches on every corner, many of which would characterize themselves as "charismatic". Does anyone find as I do, it at
least a little bit curious that almost all of the miraculous signs and wonders occur
abroad? We have literally thousands of weekly healing services throughout this
fruited plain, and yet we are hard-pressed to document a single limb grown out,
a blind man receiving sight or a deaf person hearing. Why? Why, if this ministry of the
Holy Spirit is still in operation today as it was in Jesus’ day, do we not have
thousands if not millions of clearly documented cases of miraculous
healing?
If the “sign gifts” manifested today are of the same
magnitude, scope and intensity as those regularly manifested by Peter or Paul, there
would be no room for debate. The mere fact that we have disagreements
regarding all things miraculous, proves something is amiss. If it was indeed so
obvious that “many blind eyes opened, deaf hear,
bones set that were broken, kids speak that have never spoken,” then
there would be no question. So why are there so many skeptics? Are all the doubters simply faith-challenged? Are those who don’t believe the gifts are
normative for today, as blind as this brother thinks we are?
At this juncture, let me share some personal insights, lest
anyone think I am completely ignorant of that which has been spoken of by this brother. I may not
have been to Guatemala but I have been in and around the world of the
charismata for quite a few years. Many years ago in our small Presbyterian church, within the blink of an eye we went from
“frozen chosen” Calvinists to card carrying ambassadors of the Holy Spirit’s
new wave of power. After being convinced by Terry Fullum, an Episcopal rector from Connecticut who wrote “Miracle
at Darien”, of the Holy’s Spirit’s readiness to heal and prophesy through us on
command, I began to eat and drink all things charismatic.
Multiple times I read John Wimber’s books, “Power Healing”
and “Power Evangelism”. After scouring the pages, I regularly attempted to “do the stuff”,
which was John’s endearing term for blessing others with the sign gifts. The word of wisdom, word of knowledge, prophecy, tongues and healing, were all in razor focus. We
(the pastor and a fellow elder) attended and participated in Vineyards “Signs
and Wonders Seminars”, after which we became integrally involved in Wimber’s ministry. In the midst of our fervor I was taken aback when John died of a
massive heart attack. Seemed like the irony of all ironies.
We were empowered, or so we fully believed, to
do even greater works than the Apostles. Nothing would stop this new unction of
the Holy Spirit as we could now do all things through Christ! Millions if not
more, were going to be healed and converted as this “Last days” movement swept
across the globe.
We began regular healing services modeled after Fullam and
Wimber. At a Presbyterian church, no less! Talk about making us black sheep among our cessationist friends within the PCA. And during our regular Bible studies, in
addition to the constant laying on of hands for physical healing, we added the
component of “inner healing”, which was a concept first brought to our
attention by Francis and Judith McNutt. Healing of the memories, as they called
it, was a supernatural counseling process facilitated by the pray-er but accomplished by the Holy Spirit, where God would reach back into the most
painful memories, even ones only embedded in the subconscious, and remove the
crippling emotions associated with those memories.
I remember quite vividly attending a C. Peter Wagner healing conference in Orlando, for the express purpose of learning more effectively how to channel
this new wave of the Holy Spirit’s power. It was quite an interesting
experience.
If we prayed for 1 we prayed for 1,000s with the full faith
that God was going to do miraculous works through our obedience. I had no doubt that we would eventually make our way to the local hospitals and clean them out! Just as in Jesus’ day, the infirmed would be healed by the throngs. Man, this new chapter in my life was going
to be nothing short of amazing! I had been blind to the Holy Spirit's potential for far too many years.
But something happened on my way to the revival. Not only
did a paltry few prayed-for souls show any signs of improvement, none with
serious, obvious ailments (as were mentioned by the responder above) ever became
well. Sure, occasionally people with sinus headaches and lower back pain said they
got relief, but nothing like the limbless growing new limbs, paraplegics
discarding their wheelchairs, or stage 4 cancer victims immediately and
permanently being made well. Sure, there were times when people thought they were healed, but invariably the symptoms would reappear...hopes dashed and faith challenged.
And I am sad to report that this “movement” (for lack of a
better term) had a seriously deleterious effect on my spiritual life. Something
had to be wrong with me and/or my connection to God. Why wasn't God moving as we had been told? Did God not love me or us? Was He really there? My expectations that had been at a fever pitch, were summarily throttled. Perhaps
God was distant and not nearly as involved in the affairs of His followers as I'd presumed. Doubts abounded.
These mountains of frustrations, coupled with the underpinnings of leftbehindology
(which teaches basically that God wasn’t faithful to His first century
followers) and some very unfortunate personal events (my wife’s 6 miscarriages
for starters), sent me to the front of the agnostic line. I went from elder/teacher, fervent Christian (prior to engaging in this “move of the Spirit”) to a
pathetic excuse of a skeptic. So deep and so long did I plunge spiritually,
that I cringe at the mere contemplation. My relationship with Jesus went from
vibrant and vital to pitiful and pathetic.
And like I said, though I don’t
attribute my spiritual decline to any one issue (things are always more complicated
than that), I can unequivocally report that failed expectations of the
charismata played a significant part in my plunge into skepticism.
As my heart grew dimmer and dimmer, I remember attending
Bible studies where for years I didn't contribute a word, much lest pray. But because
I didn’t want my spiritual struggles to weigh too heavily upon my impressionable
teen children, I went through the motions of my regular church activities. So, although my faith had grown weak, by outward appearance other's perceptions of my decrepit estate, were not as bad as they actually were deep within my soul. My silence was perhaps unnerving to my friends, but they really didn't know the extent of my skepticism. Back in '03, a few months after burying my father, I wrote a paper, "Through the Eyes of a Skeptic" and had anyone read it, may have been convinced of my departure from the faith.
Bringing things forward slightly, less than a decade ago, my life took a 180. Far
from being where I wanted to be (my walk with the Lord), I finally began trusting God in a
way that I hadn’t previously, even before my time attempting to “do the stuff”. It took one colossal eschatological paradigm shift
to pluck me from the abyss of spiritual ambivalence into a life of faith. Once
I realized that God was indeed faithful to His first century followers, I knew
that there was hope for me. And as my heart softened, I spent exponentially
more time in the Word...which of course had a very positive rippling affect.
Some use eschatological debate like a political football.
I, however, view eschatology pragmatically. To me, fulfilled eschatology
represented God’s undying faithfulness as He vindicated the souls under the
altar who were constantly asking, “How long, Oh Lord?” Most today still believe those crying dead believers in Revelation 6 are still waiting. And that grieves me no end.
In fulfillment, I finally had the Biblical certainly to know
why we were not able to perform the same kinds of signs and wonders as Peter,
Paul and Jesus. Just as there were
amazingly miraculous events that took place during the Exodus, there were similar
kinds of manifestations during the Exodus between the cross and the parousia.
1 Corinthians 13:8-13 (NASB) Love never fails; but if there
are gifts of prophecy, they will be done away; if there are tongues,
they will cease; if there is knowledge, it will be done away. 9 For
we know in part and we prophesy in part; 10 but when the
perfect comes, the partial will be done away. 11 When I was a
child, I used to speak like a child, think like a child, reason like a child;
when I became a man, I did away with childish things. 12 For
now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face; now I know in part, but
then I will know fully just as I also have been fully known. 13 But
now faith, hope, love, abide these three; but the greatest of these is love.
I believe the perfect came in the form of the parousia of Christ, which
lasted from 66-70 AD. Most see the parousia as a one-time moment in history. I see it as
a prolonged presence or visitation. In an Ed Steven’s podcast, he excerpted an Arthur
Melanson radio program where he shared
his understanding of Hebrews 11:30-40. (well worth the listen) As Ed rounded out the Melanson clip, he gave
great Biblical support for the ceasing of prophecy, tongues and knowledge after the
perfect came. The Canon was completed before the fall of the temple in AD 70, and I do not believe in continuing revelation, characterized as an ongoing gift
of prophecy.
I do, however, believe that God still speaks to His children. And I further believe that there are special
times when He may reveal certain future events that will help us with our daily walk. Does
God still work through dreams? I have no
doubt. But to expect this to be the ordinary course, seems less than prudent.
Quite a number of years ago, my wife received a warning from woman of stature, that there would soon (within the next year) be a great famine in our land. So certain was she of her dream, that her email was almost apoplecticly startling. That food shortage never came. Could it still come? Perhaps. Anything is possible. When people are steeped in the apocalyptic expectations of our day, no wonder they dream such things! I'm simply making the point that these kinds of supernatural expressions need to be metered by Scripture.
That said, I highly I recommend the following lectures from
R.C. Sproul, “Are
Miracles for Today?” and “The
Gifts of the Spirit”. Whatever we
experience needs to be put in a Biblical context. If we neglect to do that, I think we open ourselves up to serious error.
I’ve run out of time to do all that I intended, but suffice
it to say, if a healing is documented and proved authentic, it must be attributed to God’s grace. God can obviously use any means possible to bring about
His will and as long as all power and glory are attributed to God, and those
praying believers aren't exalted in any manner, I'll always give God
the credit.
We agree that God CAN do anything at any time. So perhaps both the cessationists and the charismatics should be diligent to avoid
putting God in their own box. Those who insist that God is moving today as He was in the
first century, may be in danger of doing the very thing I have been accused of. Just because we witness or hear about something attributed as miraculous, does not mean that these things are normative for today.
It puzzles me that it apparently doesn’t bother the sign gift
proponents even a little bit that the most amazing testimonies of the
miraculous i.e. raising the dead, are predominantly witnessed in foreign countries e.g. Guatemala
and Mexico. I have heard these kinds of claims for years. I remember hearing Benny Hinn tell of a dead man being raised to life right on the speaking platform. But, I've neither the time nor the inclination to deal with brother Hinn's issues.
Is there an anti-spiritual
force field over the U.S.? Christian illusionist Andre Kole
presents some serious challenges to the authenticity of the charismatic
movement. For the serious Bible student, I would consider the following DVD: The
Signs And Wonders Movement: Exposed
I am not skeptical that God CAN do the miraculous, the question
is, is He working in the same manner as He did through the Apostles? Is the move of the Holy Spirit as manifested through tongues, prophecy and healing, normative for today?
No comments:
Post a Comment